This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Health Care & Hospital Law,
Insurance,
Torts/Personal Injury

May 18, 2023

MICRA re-do; a redux or retread?

The basic laws of economics inform us that the imposed MICRA caps reduce the incentive of doctors to be careful or to avoid malpractice lawsuits.

Stanley L. Friedman

See more...

Art Kalantar

Healthcare Attorney

See more...

The California Legislature enacted its Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) in 1975. Long before MICRA’s enactment, there was heated debate whether the public was better served by the application of basic principles of tort law to medical malpractice lawsuits or by doctors receiving special protection in such lawsuits by the imposition of a limit on recovery for non-economic damages such as pain, suffering, emotional distress or mental anguish. MICRA impose...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up