This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Procedure

Jul. 19, 2023

State courts have jurisdiction over foreign corporations doing business in their state

We live in an interconnected world. To ensure accountability and protect the rights of individuals, state courts must exercise their jurisdiction over those that reap the benefits of that state’s economy and consumers.

Scott L. Frost

Partner
Frost Law Firm, PC

See more...

Paul C. Cook

Of Counsel
Frost Law Firm, PC

See more...

SCOTUS has poured cold water on corporate defendants’ overheated jurisdictional objections.

In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., No. 21-1168, (June 27, 2023), the United States Supreme Court found there was no violation of due process in a state statute requiring corporations doing business in its state to answer suits in that state, even if the cause of action did not arise in that state. That is a mouthful...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up