Before the COVID-19 pandemic, there was not much ambiguity in how to interpret Rule 45's "Place of Compliance" rule, which restricts a federal court's power to compel a witness to testify at a hearing or trial more than 100 miles from the proceeding. But with the proliferation of video-conference capabilities, and parties' and courts' increased reliance on them to conduct routine matters efficiently, some courts have given the requirement a more flexible and practical...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In