This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

State Bar & Bar Associations,
Letters

May 23, 2018

Time for the State Bar to ditch the MBE

Any lawyer who has practiced more than six months knows that the MBE tests no such skills.

Ira L. Shafiroff

Professor
Southwestern Law School

Email: ishafiroff@swlaw.edu

Ira is the author of "First-Year Law School Success: the Ultimate and Essential Guide for Every 1L" (4th ed. 613 House) (2018). The views expressed in Mr. Shafiroff's columns are his own.

See more...

If State Bar Executive Director Leah T. Wilson sincerely means it when she states, "Over the long term, we need to be sure that we are testing for the skills and content that new attorneys need, and that we are doing so in the right format," she and the California Committee of Bar Examiners will drop the Multistate Bar Exam portion of the bar exam. ["Bar exam results hit new low," Daily Journal, May 22].

Any lawyer who has practiced more than six months knows that the MBE tests no such skills. The MBE is merely a severely timed reading comprehension test that all too often tests not fundamental legal principles, but doctrines that more and more are coming from footnotes in hornbooks.

In almost 40 years of practice, I have never had to read a fact pattern in 1.8 minutes and then choose the "best answer" -- and do this 100 times over a three-hour period (take a 90-minute lunch break, and do it all over again in the afternoon).

Lawyers think through solutions to problems and the best way of executing those solutions, recognizing that there may be several solutions to a problem. The MBE, however, demands applicants select the one and only "best answer." The MBE affords students no opportunity to give an explanation. Just select. Guessing is okay, though!

If the MBE had existed immediately after Plessy v. Ferguson, the "best answer" would have been, "Separate but equal does not offend the United States Constitution."

The only reason to have a multiple-choice component to the bar exam is to save money, which is exactly what a bar official actually said to justify the MBE counting a full 50 percent on the new two-day bar exam. The bar would save $1 million.

It is time to dump the MBE.

While the written part (essays and performance test) is certainly not an ideal testing mechanism either, at least applicants are forced to create solutions by writing logical and coherent answers, which is what lawyers do all the time in some fashion.

On the other hand, I don't think too many judges regularly ask lawyers, "Counsel, is it A, B, C, or D?"

#347674


Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com