Ruling by
Manuel A. RamirezLower Court
San Bernardino County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Janet M. FrangieLosses that are exclusively economic without any accompanying loss of use of tangible property, does not constitute property damage; as such, the loss of using a property for a nightclub constitutes property damage.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 4DCA/2Cite as
2018 DJDAR 10511Published
Oct. 29, 2018Filing Date
Oct. 25, 2018Opinion Type
OpinionDisposition Type
Reversed
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
California Courts of Appeal, Insurance
Rulings disagree: Is loss of use of a leasehold ‘property damage’?
Oct. 1, 2020
By Peter S. Selvin
By Peter S. Selvin
