Ruling by
Ruth Bader GinsburgLower Court
9th U.S. Circuit Court of AppealsLower Court Judge
A. Wallace TashimaNinth Circuit abused its discretion when it took over the appeal and decided that 8 U.S.C. Section 1324(a) was unconstitutionally overbroad even though contrary theory was presented.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Immigration, U.S. Supreme Court
Ginsburg smacks 9th Circuit, backed by unanimous high court
May 8, 2020
By Tyler Pialet
By Tyler Pialet
