Ruling by
Kim M. WardlawLower Court
USDC Central District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
David O. Carter
Erroneous admission of statements about the victims' character did not rise to the level of constitutional error because the challenged testimony was brief and non-inflammatory.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
