Despite existing knowledge of an employee's moonlighting, the limitations period did not begin to run until victim learned of facts that caused him to investigate and discover a crime had been committed.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
California Courts of Appeal, Criminal
Appellate ruling examines discovery rule, SOL in criminal cases
Dec. 16, 2021
By Alan Eisner, Dmitry Gorin, Robert Hill
By Alan Eisner, Dmitry Gorin, Robert Hill
