Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B147937
|
Gallimore v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Motion to strike complaint under anti-SLAPP statute was improperly granted. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
C034127
|
Marin Healthcare District v. Sutter Health
'Hoadley' rule will not bar application of statute of limitations in action by state seeking to void lease and asset transfer agreement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
B154372
|
Choy v. Redland Insurance Co.
State court lacks jurisdiction to determine whether defendant in civil suit filed for bankruptcy in bad faith. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
G029720
|
Bias v. Wright
Acceptance notice of offer to compromise that imposed added condition regarding parties' costs does not constitute required proof of acceptance. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
B156183
|
Magness Petroleum Co. v. Warren Resources of California Inc.
Oral modification of written agreement to arbitrate future disputes before particular arbitrator is not enforceable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2003 | |
B152997
|
Wozniak v. Lucutz
Plaintiff may not rely upon ambiguity in own pleading to obtain better judgment at new trial. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 30, 2002 | |
01-35472
|
Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. Veneman
Court abused discretion in granting preliminary injunction against implementation of 'Roadless Rule.' |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 25, 2002 | |
B144465
|
Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic Inc.
Because covenant not to compete is contrary to public policy and California action brought first, dispute should be litigated in California. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 20, 2002 | |
02-55030
|
Fontana Empire Center LLC v. City of Fontana
Federal court had jurisdiction to review state court's decision in foreclosure case. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 16, 2002 | |
01-800
|
Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
Arbitrator, rather than court, must decide whether dispute satisfies time-limit rule of National Association of Securities Dealers. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 16, 2002 | |
99-1320
|
Reynolds v. Howsam
Court errs in concluding that parties 'clearly and unmistakably' agreed to allow arbitrator rather than courts to decide dispute is arbitrable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 10, 2002 | |
B149998
|
Humphrey v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court ( People)
Superior court's appellate division errs in certifying decision for publication and in issuing search warrant pursuant to declaration based on information and belief. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 9, 2002 | |
99-36115
|
In re Ford Motor Co.
Amount in controversy does not satisfy federal court jurisdiction because consolidated plaintiffs lack 'undivided and common interests'. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 9, 2002 | |
B147327
|
White v. Lieberman
Statute of limitations to file malicious prosecution lawsuit begins to run on date appellate court issues remittitur. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 4, 2002 | |
B155411
|
City of Hope v. Bryan Cave
Parties who are not intended beneficiaries of settlement agreements may not compel arbitration pursuant to underlying employment contracts. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 3, 2002 | |
B154678
|
Mason v. California Dept. of Real Estate
Person seeking to recover under Real Estate Recovery Program must file application within one year of court judgment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 3, 2002 | |
B148621
|
Health Industries of America Inc. v. L.A. County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Action was improperly dismissed where Judge Pro Tem had authority to toll five-year statute period. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 3, 2002 | |
B152582
|
Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction Inc.
Documents that were unilateral offers to settle and unsigned by all parties are not enforceable agreements under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 3, 2002 | |
01-15052
|
Franklin v. Fox
Summary judgment for police is proper where they possessed sufficient evidence creating probable cause to arrest plaintiff. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 2, 2002 | |
01-0818
|
Millar v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Action that was removed to district court may be amended to dismiss federal claims. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 2, 2002 | |
B159156
|
Pagarigan v. Superior Court (Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California Inc.)
Health care provider cannot compel arbitration when agreement does not comply with state's disclosure requirements. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 25, 2002 | |
B154515
|
Levine v. Levine
Statute of limitations to sue trust is not tolled until beneficiaries reach age of majority. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 25, 2002 | |
H021961
|
Pavlovich v. Superior Court (DVD Copy Control Assoc. Inc.)
California's long-arm statute reaches Web site owners who make available for copying or distribution trade secrets of copyrighted material of California companies. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 25, 2002 | |
A096741
|
Slatkin v. White
Contractor may be entitled to assert mechanic's lien despite losing license during construction project. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2002 | |
B155440
|
Ocheltree v. Gourley
Trial court erred by not issuing alternative writ and ruling on merits of petition without reviewing administrative record. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2002 | |
B151867
|
People v. Torch Energy Services Inc.
Doctrine of judicial estoppel prevents party from asserting federal pre-emption regarding oil pipeline permit conditions imposed by county. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 19, 2002 | |
01-757
|
Syngenta Crop Protection Inc. v. Henson
All Writs Act does not authorize removal of case from state to federal court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
01-35467
|
Holder v. Holder
When parent filed for custody in state court, he did not waive his rights under Hague Convention in federal court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
00-15223
|
Hosaka v. United Airlines Inc.
Court improperly dismissed action under Warsaw Convention based on forum non conveniens. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 | |
01-35107
|
Humble v. Boeing Co.
Party's state law reasonable-accommodation claim is not pre-empted by Labor Management Relations Act. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Nov. 12, 2002 |