Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-16292
|
Norita v. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
In suit by officials to recover overtime pay, court determines Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands isn't entitled to sovereign immunity defense. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2003 | |
01-16683
|
Union Oil Co. of California v. Terrible Herbst Inc.
Withholding assertion of non-frivolous claim in reliance on agreement is consideration to support contract; court abused discretion by granting new trial. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 22, 2003 | |
A097898
|
Du Charme v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 45
Defendant's statements about plaintiff that did not occur in context of ongoing controversy or discussion are not covered by anti-SLAPP statute. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 2003 | |
B155884
|
Vick v. DaCorsi
Settlement offer without apportionment was valid despite being made to married couple jointly. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 2003 | |
G029800
|
Consumer Justice Center v. Trimedica International Inc.
Commercial speech regarding product as natural alternative to breast implants is not public issue within meaning of anti-SLAPP statute. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
B157600
|
1-800 Contacts Inc. v. Steinberg
Contact lens vendor's claims against optometrist were properly struck under anti-SLAPP law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
D040084
|
Corona v. Amherst Partners
Where prevailing party did not request that arbitrator decide issue of attorney fees and costs, trial court may not make such awards. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
E032446
|
Woodside Homes of California Inc. v. Superior Court (Fogler)
Provision requiring homebuyers who sue builder to submit dispute to judicial reference is enforceable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
02-15727
|
Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA Inc.
Dismissal of action was abuse of discretion where forum selection clauses in invoices were not part of international sales contracts. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
02-15559
|
Zhang v. Dept. of Labor & Immigration
District court erred by giving preclusive effect to Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands Supreme Court's decision regarding statute of limitations. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
01-15841
|
Duk v. MGM Grand Hotel Inc.
Because second verdict was reconcilable with first verdict, it was valid and court abused its discretion by ordering new trial. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
00-56627
|
G.C. and K.B. Investments Inc. v. Wilson
District court properly had jurisdiction to enter judgment confirming default arbitration award. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
01-17040
|
Miles v. State of California
Court properly awarded costs to state following dismissal of lawsuit based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
01-16638
|
Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp.
Terminated special master may not appeal orders that fail to qualify as collateral order exception. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
02-35140
|
Beck v. The Boeing Co.
Petition to review class action certification order is timely because Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays are excluded from 10-day deadline. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
01-56718
|
Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Broad selective waiver rule does not apply to California's law of marital communications privilege. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 11, 2003 | |
02-306
|
Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson
Usury claim against national bank is governed solely by federal law and therefore removable to federal court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
02-16214
|
EIE Guam Corp. v. Long Term Credit Bank of Japan Ltd.
Foreign sovereign who was voluntarily joined as defendant may have case removed from territorial court to federal court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
02-196
|
National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Dept. of the Interior
Concessioners' challenge to validity of National Park Service regulation is not ripe for judicial resolution. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 3, 2003 | |
02-55883
|
Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. New Images of Beverly Hills
Preliminary injunction that froze assets alleged to be related to insurance fraud scheme was properly granted. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 30, 2003 | |
02-16269
|
Arakaki v. Cayetano
Native Hawaiians were not entitled to intervene in lawsuit regarding provision of state benefits. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 30, 2003 | |
01-35803
|
Mann v. American Airlines
District court had discretion to extend time to serve process after 120-day period expired. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 30, 2003 | |
01-16397
|
State of California v. Campbell
Genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Louisiana-Pacific Corp. was source of groundwater contamination in Chico, California. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 29, 2003 | |
01-35869
|
Meredith v. State of Oregon
Appellate court has jurisdiction to review district court's denial of motion to dismiss based on abstention. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 29, 2003 | |
B145698
|
Moreno v. Sanchez
Statutory period to sue home inspector for faulty inspection does not begin until buyer discovers defect. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 27, 2003 | |
A090058
|
Navellier v. Sletten
Claims protected by litigation privilege do not have minimal merit required to survive Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 motion. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
A100099
|
City of Half Moon Bay v. Superior Court (Yamagiwa)
California Coastal Commission did not have appellate jurisdiction to modify permit approval which was issued solely to comply with court order. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
B158073
|
Eichenbaum v. Alon
Court may award sanctions to defendant even after plaintiff has lawsuit dismissed with prejudice. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
A098229
|
Timney v. Lin
Illegal forfeiture provision included in settlement agreement is unenforceable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
F038382
|
The Legacy Group v. City of Wasco
Developer suing for breach of development agreement is not subject to statute of limitations of Subdivision Map Act. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 |