Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-16458
|
Geertson Seed Farms v. Johanns
District court properly enjoins future planting of genetically modified alfalfa where contamination has already occurred. |
Environmental Law |
|
Sep. 3, 2008 | |
C055059
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. California Fish and Game Commission
Sufficient evidence does not exist to support rejection of petition to add California tiger salamander to endangered species list. |
Environmental Law |
|
Sep. 3, 2008 | |
06-16000
|
El Comite para el Bienestar de Earlimart v. Warmerdam
Baseline methodology is not enforceable emission standard within meaning of Clean Air Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 20, 2008 | |
06-71891
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. National Highway Traffic Safety Aministration
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration must reconsider standards setting forth fuel economy regarding backstop setting fleet wide averages for vehicle manufacturers. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 19, 2008 | |
A114258
|
Fernandez v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation must consult with Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment before adopting regulations concerning workers' safety. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 13, 2008 | |
06-56193
|
Center for Biological Diversity v. Marina Point Development Co.
Court lacks jurisdiction in Clean Water Act citizen suit due to defective 60-day notice and simultaneous government action. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 8, 2008 | |
07-55229
|
Southwest Marine Inc. v. United States
Defendant’s fees from private party Clean Water Act lawsuit are unallowable costs where they are similar to costs barred by Federal Acquisition Regulation. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 7, 2008 | |
S143689
|
Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection (Sierra Pacific Industries)
California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection does not violate technical rule in approving selection of biological cumulative-impacts assessment areas. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 31, 2008 | |
03-74795
|
Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA exceeds authority in exempting three types of discharges from permitting requirements of Clean Water Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 25, 2008 | |
S140547
|
Environmental Protection and Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection (Pacific Lumber Company)
Sustained Yield Plan involving old-growth logging is not properly approved even though economic and employment issues were properly considered. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 18, 2008 | |
A114258
|
Fernandez v. California Dept.of Pesticide Regulation
Dept. of Pesticide Regulation must consult with Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment before adopting regulations concerning workers' safety. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 17, 2008 | |
05-35931
|
Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management violates National Environmental Policy Act where it improperly analyzes effects of plan on land's wilderness characteristics. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 15, 2008 | |
C055224
|
Sunset Skyranch Pilots Association v. County of Sacramento (Taylor)
CEQA may require environmental analysis be conducted before state agency can deny project or permit. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 3, 2008 | |
06-35634
|
Coos County Board of County Commissioners v. Kempthorne
Fish and Wildlife Services does not have duty to promptly remove species from protections of Endangered Species Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 27, 2008 | |
07-35804
|
The Lands Council v. Martin
U.S. Forest Service's definition of 'live trees' is upheld as rational explanation in relation to logging in areas affected by fires. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 26, 2008 | |
A104955
|
Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use Commission
Compatibility rather than precise conformity is required between proposed project and standards created in study under Public Utilities Code Section 21675(b). |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 20, 2008 | |
05-35832
|
Golden v. CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc.
Claims for emotional distress brought under Price-Anderson Act survive where plaintiff suffers distinct fears arising from exposure to nonradioactive materials. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 12, 2008 | |
S138974
|
In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings.
CALFED properly exercises its discretion in declining to include reduced water export alternative in environmental impact report. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 6, 2008 | |
G037999
|
Sierra Club v. City of Orange (The Irvine Co.)
Sierra Club's objection to environmental impact report's project description lacks merit. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 2, 2008 | |
05-16214
|
Our Children's Earth Foundation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
In citizen suit brought by environmental advocates, court properly finds that Environmental Protection Agency's acts or omissions were discretionary. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
06-73217
|
Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA's recent rule exempting discharges of sediment from construction activities from Clean Water Act permit requirements is found impermissible. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
H031129
|
Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission
California Coastal Commission's imposition of mitigation fee for loss of beach property from construction of seawall does not constitute unconstitutional taking. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
S143689
|
Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection (Sierra Pacific Industries)
California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection does not violate technical rule in approving selection of biological cumulative-impacts assessment areas. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 23, 2008 | |
07-16892
|
Center For Biological Diversity v. Rey
Proposed logging projects are enjoined in case where supplemental environmental impact statement is reviewed under NEPA. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 15, 2008 | |
A114205
|
Moss v. County of Humboldt
Court focuses on new and substantially important information in determining whether second environmental impact report is appropriate under CEQA. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 9, 2008 | |
07-35506
|
Bering Strait Citizens for Responsible Resource Devt. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Engineers properly discount alternatives to discharging dredge from gold mines into Alaskan wetlands before issuing permit under Clean Water Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 1, 2008 | |
06-35011
|
National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service
District court correctly determined that biological opinion of proposed operations in Columbia River System was structurally flawed. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 25, 2008 | |
B197570
|
California Water Impact Network v. Newhall County Water District (Gateking Properties)
Plaintiff cannot challenge Water Supply Assessment where it is not 'final' act or determination subject to direct mandamus review. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2008 | |
06-15162
|
Kotrous v. Goss-Jewett Co. of Northern California Inc.
Parties that incurred costs to clean up contamination must proceed under CERCLA Section 107 to recover expenses, not seek contribution under Section 113. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2008 | |
H030986
|
Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors (Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University)
Committee's claims are governed by California Environmental Quality Act statute of limitations rather than more general provisions of Government Code Section 65009. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 14, 2008 |