Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
05-379
|
Ash v. Tyson Foods Inc.
Racial animus may be evidenced by use of the term 'boy' regardless of whether speaker uses racial modifier. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 23, 2006 | |
S119498
|
State Personnel Board v. Dept. of Personnel Administration
Allowing civil service employees to bypass State Personnel Board when challenging disciplinary actions violates California Constitution. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 17, 2006 | |
B184120
|
Caliber Bodyworks Inc. v. Superior Court (Herrera)
Employees' putative class action complaint did not survive demurrer as to causes of action seeking civil penalties for alleged Labor Code violations. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 8, 2006 | |
C046744
|
Claudio v. Regents of the University of California
Triable issue existed with respect to employer's violation of duty to engage in process determining employee accommodations. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 7, 2006 | |
S125171
|
Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions
'Creative necessity' is not affirmative defense for sexual harassment that allegedly occurred on 'Friends' show. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 6, 2006 | |
02-35042
|
Alvarez v. IBP Inc.
Changing into and out of specialized protective gear constitutes 'work' under the Fair Labor Standards Act for which employees must be compensated. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 6, 2006 | |
02-55418
|
Ceballos v. Garcetti
District attorney's office is not entitled to immunity from deputy's retaliation claims. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 6, 2006 | |
C046744
|
Claudio v. Regents of the University of California
Triable issue existed with respect to employer's violation of duty to engage in process determining employee accommodations. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 6, 2006 | |
B148446
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Superior Court (Cargill)
Water district workers hired through private providers are eligible for employee retirement benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 5, 2006 | |
A095474
|
Yanowitz v. L'oreal USA Inc.
Manager who was disciplined after refusing to fire female employee deemed unattractive may sue for retaliation. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 3, 2006 | |
B158966
|
Reynolds v. Bement
Corporate agents are not personally liable for unpaid wages based on their status as 'employers' or for their allegedly tortious acts. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 3, 2006 | |
C048133
|
Cicairos v. Summit Logistics Inc.
Where employer has failed to keep records required by statute, consequences for such failure should fall on employer, not employee. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 3, 2006 | |
03-17261
|
Rivera v. Baker West Inc.
Settlement proceeds in employment harassment case were for lost wages subject to tax and withholding. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 2, 2006 | |
E031527
|
Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations Board
Court rules that six-month limitations period of employment act applies to unfair practices charges filed after July 1, 2001. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 2, 2006 | |
C048133
|
Cicairos v. Summit Logistics Inc.
Where employer has failed to keep records required by statute, consequences for such failure should fall on employer, not employee. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 25, 2006 | |
A107130
|
Goshorn v. State of California
Public entities are not required to pay costs related to employees' work uniforms. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 24, 2006 | |
03-35906
|
Hardage v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.
Actions taken by employer did not amount to constructive discharge of employee who sued for sexual harassment. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 5, 2006 | |
C043392
|
Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications Inc.
Employee who was fired for using medical marijuana failed to establish wrongful termination claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 13, 2005 | |
03-16959
|
Dominguez-Curry v. Nevada Transportation Dept.
Genuine factual dispute exists as to whether discriminatory animus played role in employer's decision not to promote female employee. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 11, 2005 | |
03-16855
|
EEOC v. United Parcel Service Inc.
Employer may refuse to hire persons with monocular vision as commercial drivers. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 11, 2005 | |
04-35029
|
EEOC v. National Education Association, Alaska
Offensive conduct that is not facially sex-specific may still be in violation of Title VII. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2005 | |
02-16537
|
Porter v. California Dept. of Corrections
Court erred in ruling for California Department of Corrections in sexual harassment suit. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 15, 2005 | |
03-57000
|
Peralta v. Hispanic Business Inc.
Plaintiff has no remedy under ERISA against employer who failed to provide timely notification that benefits were terminated. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 15, 2005 | |
A106449
|
Knight v. Hayward Unified School District
School district employee who was denied health coverage for in vitro fertilization failed to establish disability discrimination claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 11, 2005 | |
03-1238
|
IBP Inc. v. Alvarez
Time that factory employees spent between donning gear and walking to production area was compensable under Fair Labor Standards Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 10, 2005 | |
C047124
|
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Superior Court (Dennis-Johnson)
Employer's failure to begin review hearing within 60 days does not entitle terminated employee to bring immediate tort action. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 9, 2005 | |
S115823
|
Reynolds v. Bement
Individual corporate agents cannot be personally liable for corporate employer's failure to pay employee wages. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 2, 2005 | |
S115154
|
Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc.
Manager who was disciplined after refusing to fire employee deemed unattractive may sue for retaliation. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 2, 2005 | |
A105832
|
Conley v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Employer may deduct vacation time for exempt employee's partial-day absence. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 25, 2005 | |
B180814
|
Huntington Memorial Hospital v. Superior Court (Mutuc)
Nurses may sue hospital for paying 'short-shift differential' in effort to evade overtime laws. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 17, 2005 |