Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S106718
|
Sav-on Drug Stores Inc. v. Superior Court (Rocher)
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying class action against drugstore chain for recovery of unpaid overtime compensation. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 7, 2004 | |
D042431
|
Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp.
First Amendment applies only to state actions and expresses no public policy against terminations by private employers for speech-related activities. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 5, 2004 | |
B167180
|
Weinberg v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Hospital board did not err in deciding physician's staff privileges should be suspended. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 5, 2004 | |
03-35818
|
Nike Inc. v. McCarthy
Former employee's non-competition agreement with Nike is enforceable. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 28, 2004 | |
02-35805
|
Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church
Court erred in dismissing minister's Title VII claims under 'ministerial exception' when some viable claims existed. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
C043878
|
Estes v. Monroe
Disabled national guardsman's wrongful termination lawsuit was properly dismissed. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
D043178
|
Medical Staff of Sharp Memorial Hospital v. Superior Court (Pancoast)
Hospital acted properly in suspending physician's staff privileges in interest of protecting patients. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
H024375
|
Reeves v. Safeway Stores Inc.
Employer may be liable for retaliatory discharge where supervisor's retaliatory motive was cause of employee's dismissal. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
F042980
|
Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services Inc.
Court erred in granting employer summary adjudication when employee's acts did not amount to federally protected concerted activities. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
02-56082
|
Watkins v. Ameripride Services
Issue regarding employer's use of interstate commerce during product delivery revives employee's overtime claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 24, 2004 | |
03-15545
|
Werft v. Desert Southwest Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church
'Ministerial exception' precludes pastor's discrimination claims against church from being litigated. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 20, 2004 | |
S114811
|
Reeves v. Hanlon
Inducing termination of at-will employment relationship is actionable under intentional interference with prospective economic advantage theory. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 20, 2004 | |
02-57183
|
Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust for Southern California v. Vonderharr
Employee-benefit plan's claims against worker for contractual restitution are not cognizable under ERISA. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 17, 2004 | |
03-15193
|
Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona Inc.
Employee's success in grieving overtime pay errors does not bar him from pursuing discrimination claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 25, 2004 | |
S113359
|
Nolan v. City of Anaheim
To qualify for disability retirement, former police officer must show he is incapacitated from working for state law enforcement agencies. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 24, 2004 | |
A098067
|
Roe v. State Personnel Board (Dept. of Justice)
Due to procedurally improper termination, plaintiff is entitled to backpay from Department of Justice. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 23, 2004 | |
02-35881
|
Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co. Inc.
Cab company presents sufficient evidence that discharge of elderly employee was without discriminatory intent. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 23, 2004 | |
C044046
|
Sinatra v. Chico Unified School District
Program allowing educators to work part time rather than retire does not constitute fundamental and substantial public policy. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 23, 2004 | |
G032967
|
Hope International University v. Superior Court (Rouanzoin)
Christian university is not entitled to summary judgment on basis of 'ministerial exception' after termination of employees. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 23, 2004 | |
S125187
|
Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Massie
By failing to reach issue of unconscionability, court could not address arbitrability issue of defendant's claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 16, 2004 | |
D042249
|
Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Massie
By failing to reach issue of unconscionability, court could not address arbitrability issue of defendant's claim. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 12, 2004 | |
01-15512
|
Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Co.
Terminated employee with drug and alcohol problem who was not rehired may sue under Americans with Disabilities Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 10, 2004 | |
B142840
|
Salazar v. Diversified Paratransit Inc.
Employer may be liable under Fair Employment and Housing Act for sexual harassment committed by clients. |
Employment Law |
|
Aug. 8, 2004 | |
B168749
|
Franzosi v. Santa Monica Community College District
Tenured college instructor had 39 months from effective date of disability retirement to seek reinstatement. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 29, 2004 | |
S103487
|
Dept. of Health Services v. Superior Court (McGinnis)
Employer is strictly liable for hostile environment sexual harassment by supervisor under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 28, 2004 | |
S106660
|
Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
City employee claiming discrimination under FEHA need not exhaust exhaust administrative remedies under city charter. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 28, 2004 | |
D041608
|
Salus v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Association
Sick leave payments are not final compensation required in calculating appellants' retirement benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 28, 2004 | |
A101244
|
Vernon v. State of California
State is not liable for policy that prohibited African-American firefighter from working because of facial hair. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 26, 2004 | |
S102371
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Superior Court (Cargill)
Public Employees' Retirement Law requires contracting public agencies to enroll common law employees in state's public employees' retirement program. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 26, 2004 | |
B159471
|
Mathieu v. Norrell Corp.
Temporary employment agency may be liable for retaliation against worker who complained of sexual harassment while on assignment. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 25, 2004 |