Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-16856
|
Leong v. Potter
Former postal employee failed to exhaust remedies as to disability discrimination claim and did not demonstrate prima facie case of Title VII discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 7, 2004 | |
01-57013
|
Liu v. Amway Corp.
Employer's denial of maternity leave extensions to plaintiff were in violation of her rights under the FMLA. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 7, 2004 | |
B145835
|
Betancourt v. Storke Housing Investors
Enforcement of mechanics' lien, filed by construction laborers for unpaid contributions to their benefit plan, isn't preempted by ERISA. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 15, 2003 | |
B163686
|
Rivera v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Injured employee was entitled to receive payments of periodic disability indemnity in lump sum. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 12, 2003 | |
E033208
|
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Employee who worked less than six months was not entitled to workers' compensation for injury to psyche. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 12, 2003 | |
C043584
|
Granite Construction Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board acted beyond its jurisdiction when it awarded additional benefits to respondent after statutory period had run. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 12, 2003 | |
A097623
|
Collins v. Overnite Transportation Co.
Truck drivers are exempt from overtime requirements of state wage law. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 11, 2003 | |
H024330
|
Perez v. County of Santa Clara
Prison nurse failed to establish case of racial discrimination and retaliation. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 9, 2003 | |
B161081
|
Sheffield v. Dept. of Social Services County of Los Angeles
Whether hostile work environment existed was factual question for trier of fact to resolve. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 5, 2003 | |
B159820
|
Ali v. L.A. Focus Publication
Newspaper columnist who was fired after publicly criticizing mayoral candidate may sue for wrongful termination. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 5, 2003 | |
E032525
|
Sahlolbei v. Providence Healthcare Inc.
Hospital was required to hold hearing before terminating physician's staff privileges. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 4, 2003 | |
B142999
|
Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
Before city employee files suit, administrative remedies provided under Fair Employment and Housing Act and City Charter must be exhausted. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
B142840
|
Salazar v. Diversified Paratransit Inc.
California Fair Employment and Housing Act does not create employer liability when non-employee client or customer sexually harasses employee. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
E030908
|
Carter v. California Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Veterans' hospital is not liable under state law for harassing conduct of patient. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
01-15512
|
Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Co.
Company's policy not to rehire employees who resigned due to violations of personal conduct rules violates ADA, as applied to rehabilitated drug addicts. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
02-35536
|
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pacific Maritime Assn.
Shipping association that dispatched assignments was not joint employer of worker alleging sexual harassment. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
02-749
|
Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez
Employer may not be liable for refusing to rehire employee who had been forced to resign for using cocaine. |
Employment Law |
|
Dec. 2, 2003 | |
E032426
|
McDaneld v. Eastern Municipal Water District Board
Employer could properly terminate worker based on reasonable belief he was misusing his family leave. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 26, 2003 | |
B154868
|
Palmer v. Regents of the University of California
University employee alleging retaliation must exhaust internal grievance procedures before filing lawsuit. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 26, 2003 | |
F041054
|
Johnson v. County of Fresno
County may be liable for sexually harassment committed by employee despite being dismissed from lawsuit. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 25, 2003 | |
H023839
|
Grant v. Comp USA Inc.
Employee alleging discrimination was entitled to sue when agency failed to issue right-to-sue letter within year of filing of complaint. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2003 | |
G029742
|
Escalante v. Wilson's Art Studio Inc.
Employer may terminate at-will employee for engaging in self-defense when retreat was possible. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2003 | |
C034163
|
Dept. of Health Services v. Superior Court (McGinnis)
'Burlington/Faragher' defense for employers does not apply to sexual harassment suits brought under California Fair Employment and Housing Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2003 | |
00-56803
|
Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles
Deputy probation officer failed to establish discrimination on basis of national origin. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 21, 2003 | |
00-57222
|
EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps
Caselaw prohibiting employers from requiring applicants to sign arbitration agreements is overruled. |
Employment Law |
|
Nov. 17, 2003 | |
C041708
|
Hastings v. Dept. of Corrections
Employee seeking accommodation is not entitled to reassignment to position in different civil service classification without first complying with competitive examination process. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 24, 2003 | |
01-36018
|
Fraser v. Goodale
In action against her employer, plaintiff presented genuine issue of material fact that her diabetes significantly limits major life activity of eating. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 22, 2003 | |
01-35508
|
Bell v. Clackamas County
Sheriff's office is liable for retaliation against African-American deputy. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 21, 2003 | |
02-15850
|
Taybron v. City and County of San Francisco
In sexual harassment action, district court erred in finding that there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding issue of remediation. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 21, 2003 | |
01-35847
|
Manatt v. Bank of America
Although 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 encompasses retaliation and hostile work environment claims, plaintiff failed to prove co-worker's actions were sufficiently severe. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 16, 2003 |