| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A090162
|
Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court (Foti)
Court abuses its discretion by issuing discovery order requiring disclosure of names, addresses and phone numbers of Planned Parenthood staff and volunteers. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | |
|
97-55085
|
La Crosse v. Kernan
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
99SC133
|
Smith v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Medicare Secondary Payer provisions of Social Security Act doesn't limit amount medical provider can collect from no-fault insurer where Medicare has made conditional payment. |
Insurance |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | |
|
S090220
|
Ordorica v. Worker's Compensation Appeals Board
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S086237
|
People v. Gaul
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S067058
|
Silo v. CHW Medical Foundation
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S083427
|
People v. Demetillo
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S085576
|
People v. Hyun
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S089660
|
Guy F. Atkinson Company of California v. Franchise Tax Board
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S089986
|
Vanessa E., a Minor
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S090177
|
Busch v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S088962
|
Osca Development Co. v. Elkin
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S088815
|
Schiavo v. Gold Strike Hotel and Gambling Hall
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S090439
|
Shore v. Schwartz
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S090517
|
Montgomery Ward and Company Incorporated v. Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Company
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S088441
|
Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
S090339
|
Los Angeles County Employees Association v. Superior Court
Order |
|
Sep. 18, 2000 | ||
|
G021350
|
Gab Business Services Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services Inc.
Corporation officer who orchestrates mass exodus of corporations' employees to competitor breaches fiduciary duty. |
Corporations |
|
Sep. 15, 2000 | |
|
99-16328
|
Manistee Town Center v. City of Glendale
Noerr-Pennington immunity applies to lobbying and public relations efforts conducted by City of Glendale and its officials. |
Civil Rights |
|
Sep. 14, 2000 | |
|
99-30012
|
U. S. v. Johnson
Order |
|
Sep. 13, 2000 | ||
|
98-71179
|
Zahedi v. INS
Refugee facing persecution in home country for distribution of political literature is eligible for asylum. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 13, 2000 | |
|
98-36090
|
Munger v. City of Glasgow Police Dept.
Police officers don't have qualified immunity from liability for civil damages when they eject intoxicated man wearing T-shirt from bar into sub-freezing temperatures. |
Torts |
|
Sep. 13, 2000 | |
|
99-55222
|
Kling v. Hallmark Cards Inc.
Issue of material fact exists as to whether widow of writer for 'Rainbow Brite' cartoon script has cognizable claim of copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Sep. 13, 2000 | |
|
99-10071
|
U.S. v. Albers
Ram-air chutes used by individuals jumping from structures in national parks are parachutes for purposes of federal regulations. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 13, 2000 | |
|
98-71195
|
Chanchavac v. INS
Alien is entitled to asylum based on evidence of pervasive violence against alien by homeland military forces. |
Immigration |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 | |
|
00A145
|
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative
Order |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 | ||
|
98-0411
|
Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd.
Objection to qualifications of expert witness must be made before or at time testimony is given, not after. |
Torts |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 | |
|
99-0497
|
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream
Litigant may file notice of lis pendens on Arizona real property in connection with extraterritorial litigation potentially affecting title to that property. |
Real Property |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 | |
|
99-1480
|
Arnold v. Gill (In re Arnold)
Amendment to exemptions being considered in Chapter 7 action are not in bad faith or prejudicial merely because they are untimely. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 | |
|
99-0896
|
State of Arizona v. Wood
Custodial interference statute does not require pendency of custody proceedings before person can be charged under its provisions. |
Family Law |
|
Sep. 11, 2000 |