9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Immigration
Mar. 21, 2017
Let's not assume good faith
On March 15, five 9th Circuit judges dissented from an order denying en banc review in Washington v. Trump, the appellate decision that upheld a temporary restraining order on President Donald J. Trump's first travel ban.
Robert L. Bastian Jr.
Partner
Bastian & Dini
9025 Wilshire Blvd, Penthouse
Beverly Hills , CA 90211
Phone: (310) 789-1955
Fax: (310) 822-1989
Email: robbastian@aol.com
Whittier Law School
On March 15, five 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges dissented from an order denying en banc review in Washington v. Trump, the appellate decision that upheld a temporary restraining order on President Donald J. Trump's "Muslim Travel Ban 1.0." (One day later, an amended order added into the mix separate opinions by dissenting Judges Alex Kozinski and Carlos Bea, an additional concurrence by Judge Marsha Berzon, and an addition to Judge Stephen Reinhardt's prior concurrence....
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In