SHENKMAN
LOS ANGELES -- Little by little, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP defense attorney Marcellus McRae has sought to reveal in a bench trial the information a plaintiff's historian didn't present in his testimony that Santa Monica's at-large system creates racially polarized voting.
It took five days, but McRae's cross-examination of social historian Morgan Kousser in the voting discrimination case ended Thursday.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



