Construction,
Insurance,
Civil Litigation
Feb. 6, 2019
Construction defect cases provide guidance for coverage disputes
Recent construction defect decisions may influence, if not resolve, coverage disputes in certain construction defect cases. And, of greater interest, these recent decisions may be applicable to other coverage disputes.
Rex Heeseman
JAMS
555 W 5th St Fl 32
Los Angeles , CA 90013-1055
Phone: (213) 253-9772
Fax: (213) 620-0100
Email: rheeseman@jamsdar.com
Stanford Univ Law School
Rex Heeseman retired from the Los Angeles Count Superior Court bench in 2014. He is at JAMS, Los Angeles. Besides speaking at various MCLE programs, he co-authors The Rutter Group's practice guide on "Insurance Litigation." From 2002 to 2015, he was an adjunct professor at Loyola Law School.
In insurance litigation, the issue of policy interpretation is often key. That is, what is the legal meaning of a word (or phrase) in the policy? The answer frequently decides whether the "winner" is the policyholder or the insurance company.
In the construction defect world, Global Modular, Inc. v. Kadena Pacific, Inc.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In