9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Criminal
Mar. 18, 2019
9th Circuit senior judge calls for reconsideration of parolees’ privacy rights
A senior judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals urged her colleagues Friday to reconsider the state of privacy law as it applies to probationers and parolees, saying relevant Fourth Amendment jurisprudence as it currently stands fails to adequately grapple with the reality of modern technology.
A senior judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals urged her colleagues Friday to reconsider the state of privacy law as it applies to probationers and parolees, saying relevant Fourth Amendment jurisprudence as it stands fails to adequately grapple with the reality of modern technology.
The concurrence comes nine months after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Criminal Law and Procedure
Samson v. California
Parolee's conviction for possession of methamphetamine is proper where Fourth Amendment does not prohibit suspicionless search of parolee.
Constitutional Law
Carpenter v. United States
Notwithstanding third-party doctrine, defendant maintains reasonable expectation of privacy in cellphone-generated location data.
Criminal Law and Procedure
U.S. v. Korte
Warrantless placement of a GPS tracker on a parolee's car was permissible in light of 'United States v. Johnson' which held that the warrantless search of a parolee's cell phone was permi...
