9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Constitutional Law,
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct. 14, 2020
9th circuit conservatives dissent in takings case likely headed to high court
The appellate court majority affirmed a panel decision in the city's favor in a case involving whether a property owner who co-owned a residential building could move into one of the units if a lifetime lease was offered to the tenant.
A Fifth Amendment takings case may be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court after a large contingent of conservative judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dissented Tuesday from a ruling in a property owners' dispute with San Francisco.
The appellate court majority affirmed a panel decision in the city's favor in a case involving whether a property owner who co-owned a residential building could move into one of the units if ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Richard Seeborg
Constitutional Law
Knick v. Township of Scott
State-litigation requirement under 'Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City' imposes an unjustifiable burden on takings plaintiffs, conflicts with the ...