This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Sep. 13, 2021

Beware the risks of proffer agreements

A recent appellate opinion will serve as a stark warning to defense counsel to advise their clients about the risks, and not just the potential benefits, of agreeing to proffer with the government.

Dmitry Gorin

Partner
Eisner Gorin LLP

See more...

Alan Eisner

Partner
Eisner Gorin LLP

See more...

Robert Hill

Associate
Eisner Gorin LLP

See more...

Relying heavily on principles of contract law, the 2nd District Court of Appeal in People v. Palacios, 2021 DJDAR 7838 (July, 29, 2021), held that the trial court had properly admitted statements made by a criminal defendant pursuant to a proffer agreement with the prosecution because the defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that his statements were trut...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up