Nov. 22, 2022
State Bar clarifies differences between two Provisional Licensure Programs
This letter is in response to a Nov. 18 Daily Journal story on the State Bar Board of Trustees vote to send options for consideration to the Supreme Court of California to continue the highly successful Provisional Licensure Program (PLP). The article seemed to collapse and confuse the two different versions of the PLP, so we wanted to set the record straight.
The original PLP was directed by the Court in response to the COVID-19...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In