This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
U.S. Supreme Court

Nov. 28, 2022

High court to weigh how far attorney-client privilege extends

Petitioners in the case, as well as an amicus curiae brief filed by the California Lawyers Association, argue that the 9th Circuit ruling should be reversed because it narrows attorney-client privilege in a way that conflicts with opinions from other circuits.

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering how far attorney-client privilege extends in situations in which clients seek advice that is not exclusively legal but relates to business, taxes and other issues.

The justices are scheduled to hear arguments in January in a case reviewing a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmance of a lower court decision that held an unidentified company and law firm in contempt in a tax case.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up