Reversing a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that a federal law against inducing or encouraging illegal immigration is overly broad, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that such speech is not protected by the First Amendment.
“Properly interpreted, this provision forbids only the intentional solicitation or facilitation of certain unlawful acts,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote for the 7-...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



