California Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Aug. 16, 2023
Title IX: What the Boermeester v. Carry decision means for private universities
The court made the appropriate decision here because universities should be empowered to hold wrong-doers accountable, and not be hamstrung in their ability to take action on instances of serious misconduct.
Alezah Trigueros
Investigator, Hearing Officer, and Partner
Oppenheimer Investigations Group LLP
Title IX investigations
Email: alezah@oiglaw.com
The Supreme Court of California’s July 31 opinion in Boermeester v. Carry determined University of Southern California’s resolution process for reports of sexual misconduct complied with the common law doctrine of fair procedure, notwithstanding that live cross-examination was not part of the University’s process. In doing so, they declined to impose on private universities the unnecessary procedures imposed on public ones and took a step ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In