This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Aug. 28, 2023

Whether social media is a private actor or “public square” may finally be resolved

The primary question in two cases from separate circuits is whether laws restricting content-moderation on social media comply with the First Amendment. Given the national importance of this question, and because the parties and the United States agree that certiorari is warranted, the U.S. Supreme Court will likely take up the issue.

Cameron Schlagel

Associate
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P

See more...

An intense national debate has erupted in recent years concerning the role of social media companies in public discourse, and the proper balance between free speech and content-moderation practices.

In 2021, Florida and Texas waded into this debate, enacting laws that restrict major social media platforms – like Facebook, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter) – from engaging in content-moderation by removing or editing user-generated content....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up