California Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment
Aug. 29, 2023
Timekeeper rounding practices may be running out of time
In reviewing cases dealing with rounding time policies, appellate courts up until recently stood behind the ruling in See's Candy, opining that a rounding policy is lawful if it is facially neutral and applied "in such a manner that it will not result, over a period of time, in failure to compensate the employees properly for all the time they have actually worked." That may change.
Lonnie D. Giamela
Fisher & Phillips LLPPhone: (213) 330-4454
Email: lgiamela@fisherphillips.com
Georgetown Univ Law Ctr; Washington DC
Following its decision in Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc., the employment law spotlight on the California Supreme Court has now shifted to Camp v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. wherein the high court will review whether, under California law, employers are permitted to use neutral time-rounding practices to calculate employees' work time for payroll purposes.
The argument over whether neut...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In