This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law,
U.S. Supreme Court

Oct. 24, 2023

What to know about Culley v. Marshall

Respondents express concern that, under Mathews, a host of new procedural questions would arise, forcing federal courts to “micromanage state forfeiture rules under the guise of constitutional law.”

Conor Tucker

litigation and appellate law

Conor regularly represents clients before the Court and in state and federal courts of appeal across the country. Views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of his firm or its clients.

See more...

At issue in Culley v. Marshall - which the Supreme Court will hear on October 30 - is what test courts should use to assess whether due process has been violated after the government seizes property. Two lines of cases point to two different tests and have resulted in a circuit split which the Court is set to resolve. Here's what you need to know going into the argument.

<...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up