This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Judge OKs Suit Against ADA Lawyer

By Matthew King | Jun. 22, 2002
News

Civil Rights

Jun. 22, 2002

Judge OKs Suit Against ADA Lawyer

SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed against noted East Bay disability rights attorney Paul Rein by a former client who has acknowledged the suit is an act of vengeance.

By Matthew King
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed against noted East Bay disability rights attorney Paul Rein by a former client who has acknowledged the suit is an act of vengeance.
        Despite a number of declarations - including one by an Alameda County Superior Court judge - that the suit's allegations are false, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney in San Francisco found the suit contained a triable issue of fact worthy of further litigation.
        Rein was sued in April by Oakland resident George Louie, an amputee who had been Rein's client in five previous disability access suits. Louie's suit claims that on April 24, 2001, the restroom in Rein's office was not up to the standards prescribed by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Americans With Disabilities Advocates v. Rein, C02-1967MMC.
        In an interview last month, Louie said he filed the in pro per suit because "Paul started messing with me and now I'm fighting back."
        The suit was filed on the last day possible under the one-year statute of limitations for lodging a civil complaint. Louie has acknowledged in subsequent court filings that the day he tried to use Rein's bathroom might actually have been previous to the day alleged in the suit.
        Still, Chesney ruled that Louie's indecision about the date "does not constitute a dispositive admission that Louie did not attempt to use the restroom in question within the one-year limitations period."
        Chesney also refused, as a matter of law, to grant Rein summary judgment on grounds Louie's extensive criminal history is enough to impeach his complaint.
        Under state and federal law, a conviction for a crime of dishonesty can be used as evidence that a sworn declaration is not credible. However, Chesney wrote, "the Court cannot resolve credibility disputes on a motion for summary judgment."
        In her order, released Monday, Chesney did dismiss the complaint in regards to Louie's nonprofit organization, Americans With Disabilities Advocates, because federal law prohibits nonlawyers from representing organizations. She said Louie could press the suit as an individual, however.
        Rein expressed frustration Thursday that he has to continue fighting the suit, but said Louie is likely to regret moving forward.
        "The longer this goes, the more chances Louie will have to commit perjury again and go back to prison," Rein said.
        Louie could not be reached for comment.

#299413

Matthew King

Daily Journal Staff Writer

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com