This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Rucker v. Davis

Order


Cite as

2000 DJDAR 9211

Published

Nov. 2, 2000

Filing Date

Aug. 17, 2000



PEARLIE RUCKER; HERMAN WALKER; WILLIE LEE; BARBARA HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAROLD DAVIS; OALKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants, and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-16322 D.C. No. CV-98-00781-CRB PEARLIE RUCKER; HERMAN WALKER; WILLIE LEE; BARBARA HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAROLD DAVIS; OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants-Appellants, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant. No. 98-16542 D.C. No. CV-98-00781-CRB United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit Filed August 18, 2000
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
        Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1        Judges Wardlaw and Fisher were recused.

1 Daily Appellate Report
#250477

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424