| Ramirez: responding to restrictions on the affirmative use of PMQ testimony |
Appellate Practice,
Law Practice
|
Feb. 8, 2023 |
| Mayday! M’aidez! You shall reconsider your thoughts about “may!” |
Appellate Practice,
Law Practice
|
May 24, 2022 |
| When is ‘each defendant’ not ‘every defendant’? Under Prop 51 |
California Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Torts/Personal Injury
|
Aug. 19, 2020 |
| You do not forfeit an objection you didn’t have |
California Supreme Court
|
Mar. 11, 2020 |
| State Supreme Court ‘clarifies’ expert witnesses and hearsay |
California Supreme Court
|
Mar. 3, 2020 |
| Legal innovation report: part promising, part unexceptionable |
State Bar & Bar Associations,
Law Practice
|
Aug. 23, 2019 |
| Anti-SLAPP appeals: extensions and civility are not bad faith |
Appellate Practice,
California Courts of Appeal,
Civil Litigation
|
Feb. 7, 2018 |
| Product liability decision hits hard, but may not reach far |
Appellate Practice,
California Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation
|
Jan. 17, 2018 |
| What happens in Vegas might be resolved by a California court |
Perspective
|
Feb. 2, 2017 |
| Hearsay ruling will affect civil cases, too |
Perspective
|
Aug. 4, 2016 |
| Prenatal limitations statute circuit split |
Perspective
|
Jun. 11, 2016 |
| E-filing is coming to superior courts |
Litigation
|
May 18, 2016 |